On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 01:41:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > - Update comments in code, htup.h and xact.c
> The "update" in xact.c seemed to consist of wholesale removal of the top
> comment. I didn't apply it, because the comment didn't seem that
> useless. It does need editorial work, but it's not content-free...
Well, the README file integrated those comments as appropiate.
Apparently the embed-new-files-in-patch business was not a good idea
after all. Sorry for not being clear on the message.
Again, thanks for all your excellent work on this.
Oh, I was wondering whether it would be a good idea to move tqual.c
to access/transam. I think it's weird in utils/time, and do we really
want a directory for just one file that's even badly placed according
to the comments on the file itself?
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>)
"Y eso te lo doy firmado con mis lágrimas" (Fiebre del Loco)
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-08-01 19:03:20|
|Subject: Re: [subxacts] Last try before beta |
|Previous:||From: Roger Leigh||Date: 2004-08-01 18:09:18|
|Subject: Troff -ms output for psql|