Re: InformationWeek article on PostgreSQL

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: InformationWeek article on PostgreSQL
Date: 2004-07-21 17:04:44
Message-ID: 200407211904.44200.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Guys who would contact Geoff Davidson about PostgreSQL (sorry
> > Geoff) know so little about us that it is not even worth the paper
> > it is printed on.
>
> Based on what do you jump to the conclusion that he "knows so little
> about us"?

That's not what Bruce said. Bruce said that people who want information
about PostgreSQL and for that reason contact Geoff Davidson are
misguided, which is true. Of course, it's still a far better shot than
contacting the owner of the grocery store at the corner, but it still
doesn't show much of a clue on the part of the author of the article.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-07-21 17:42:49 Re: InformationWeek article on PostgreSQL
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-07-21 16:48:31 Re: InformationWeek article on PostgreSQL