On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 22:30:05 +0800,
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
> >>Well, if we add them (and they would be very useful I reckon) should we
> >>ensure there's an obvious PG naming thing happening?
> Why are they useful???? If you want PG specific stuff then use the PG
> specific catalogs!!!
The information schema could be used to provide a more stable interface.
The pg catalog changes from release to release and it would be nice to
be able to write code which is more future proof.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Merlin Moncure||Date: 2004-07-02 15:18:44|
|Subject: Re: [Re] Re: PREPARE and transactions|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2004-07-02 14:56:56|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Show encoding in initdb messages|