Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004
Date: 2004-06-02 03:08:00
Message-ID: 200406020308.i52380g27524@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> That seems to indicate that at that stage, barely 2 months ago, the 
> month was not definite, let alone the day.
> 
> I confess that as a newcomer I was not around before the 7.4 cycle, so 
> saying that people should have known the freeze date because it is 
> following past patterns doesn't help me much. Are people supposed to 
> obtain this info by trawling mailing list archives years back, or by 
> some sort of divine revelation? Other OS projects manage this whole 
> process better, IMNSHO. I'm not trying to point fingers, but to get 
> future improvement.

I sent this email on April 16th asking for a status on the big 7.5
features:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-06-02 03:17:40
Subject: Re: Nested transactions and tuple header info
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-06-02 03:00:03
Subject: Re: Converting postgresql.conf parameters to kilobytes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group