Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I have applied the following patch to clarify the meaning of the second
> > DateStyle field.
> Am I seeing correctly that this is actually just a one-word insertion?
> You do your readers no favor by providing patches for comment that
> consist largely of content-free rearrangement of line breaks.
Yea, confusing. The change was from:
and the date field order specification
and the input/output specification for year/month/day ordering
When I am in there, I take the opportunity to clean up the arrangement.
If I don't my new text pushes everything out of alignment.
I guess I could make the changes, do a diff, then reformat before
applying to CVS. Would that help?
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Freddy Villalba Arias||Date: 2004-04-15 10:39:49|
|Subject: PostgreSQL on Windows?|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-04-15 05:27:39|
|Subject: Re: Clarification of DateStyle |