Re: pg_autovacuum next steps

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_autovacuum next steps
Date: 2004-03-22 04:00:46
Message-ID: 200403220400.i2M40k424587@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > B) Perhaps people like the idea of it being a client app (I don't think
> > so.)
> >
>
> I'd like to see it as part of the backend.
>
> > C) Most importantly, I'm not backend hacker. If someone wants to do the
> > initial work of getting it running as a backend process, I can take it
> > from there. A while ago, Bruce offered to help me with any backend
> > issues I might have, so perhaps with a little help I can take a run at
> > it.
>
> I'd be happy to help you out.

Agreed.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-03-22 05:19:40 Re: SET WITHOUT CLUSTER patch
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-22 03:49:09 Re: [HACKERS] libpq thread safety