From: | Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar(at)frodo(dot)hserus(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | [OT] Respository [was Re: [PERFORM] Feature request: smarter use of conditional indexes] |
Date: | 2004-03-09 07:02:43 |
Message-ID: | 200403091232.43621.shridhar@frodo.hserus.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Sunday 07 March 2004 09:16, Tom Lane wrote:
> Personally I consider -c format the only one of the three that is
> readable for reviewing purposes, so even if I weren't intending
> immediate application, I'd ask for -c before looking at the patch.
> There are some folks who consider -u format readable, but I'm not
> one of them ...
I was wondering what people use to keep track of their personal development
especially when they do not have a cvs commit access.
I am toying with idea of using GNU arch for personal use. It encourages
branching, merging and having as many repository trees as possible. I haven't
tried it in field as yet but if it delivers what it promises, it could be a
great assistance.
I know that there are not many postgresql branches like say linux kernel needs
but having a good tool does not hurt, isn't it..:-)
Just a thought..
Shridhar
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2004-03-09 08:21:30 | Re: On pgweb project (Re: Update on 'portal' changes) |
Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2004-03-09 06:57:29 | Re: Thread safe connection-name mapping in ECPG. Is it |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Teran | 2004-03-09 09:54:10 | Re: speeding up a select with C function? |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-03-08 23:28:25 | Re: [PERFORM] WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage |