[OT] Respository [was Re: [PERFORM] Feature request: smarter use of conditional indexes]

From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar(at)frodo(dot)hserus(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [OT] Respository [was Re: [PERFORM] Feature request: smarter use of conditional indexes]
Date: 2004-03-09 07:02:43
Message-ID: 200403091232.43621.shridhar@frodo.hserus.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On Sunday 07 March 2004 09:16, Tom Lane wrote:
> Personally I consider -c format the only one of the three that is
> readable for reviewing purposes, so even if I weren't intending
> immediate application, I'd ask for -c before looking at the patch.
> There are some folks who consider -u format readable, but I'm not
> one of them ...

I was wondering what people use to keep track of their personal development
especially when they do not have a cvs commit access.

I am toying with idea of using GNU arch for personal use. It encourages
branching, merging and having as many repository trees as possible. I haven't
tried it in field as yet but if it delivers what it promises, it could be a
great assistance.

I know that there are not many postgresql branches like say linux kernel needs
but having a good tool does not hurt, isn't it..:-)

Just a thought..

Shridhar

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2004-03-09 08:21:30 Re: On pgweb project (Re: Update on 'portal' changes)
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2004-03-09 06:57:29 Re: Thread safe connection-name mapping in ECPG. Is it

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Teran 2004-03-09 09:54:10 Re: speeding up a select with C function?
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2004-03-08 23:28:25 Re: [PERFORM] WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage