On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Claims of "conformance" are a bit specious when there isn't much of a
> > standards body on this anymore. And vendors that consider themselves
> > commercially important are quite prepared to ignore standards whenever
> > it seems convenient.
> Yeah, why do you think they disbanded the compliance team in the first place?
> Just ask Joe Celko ....
I haven't spoken with Joe in years.. why don't you tell us?
Dan Langille - BSDCan: http://www.bsdcan.org/
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2004-02-27 14:29:24|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal|
|Previous:||From: Troels Arvin||Date: 2004-02-27 08:53:45|
|Subject: Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance|