Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>,Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Date: 2004-02-26 22:52:49
Message-ID: 200402261452.49385.josh@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32pgsql-www
People,

The question is, do we need BZ right off or should we try GForge's lightweight 
tool first?    Personally I find that BZ is a little intimidating to new 
users, particularly for searching on issues; as a result it tends to lead to 
a lot of duplicate filings.

-- 
-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco


In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: David CostaDate: 2004-02-26 22:56:45
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Why not fork PHP.NET
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-02-26 22:49:33
Subject: Re: Upgraded Site..any news ?

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: David CostaDate: 2004-02-26 22:56:45
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Why not fork PHP.NET
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-02-26 22:47:20
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David CostaDate: 2004-02-26 22:56:45
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Why not fork PHP.NET
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-02-26 22:47:20
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: David CostaDate: 2004-02-26 22:56:45
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Why not fork PHP.NET
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-02-26 22:47:20
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group