Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: libpq notice processors

From: "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libpq notice processors
Date: 2004-01-30 11:54:30
Message-ID: 20040130115430.GC19680@xs4all.nl (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 02:07:39PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> If we were going to demand a change in notice processors, I'd think the
> better approach is just to state that the notice text may or may not end
> in a newline, and the hook routine should strip or add one as it wishes.
> This is less of a change conceptually than splitting a single logical
> message across multiple calls.  But I disagree with changing the API at
> all.

Fair enough.


In response to

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Zoe De LacyDate: 2004-01-30 18:43:57
Subject: HPUX 11.11 DBI, DBD, Pg ld: Mismatched ABI (not an ELF file) for -lpq, postgresql
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-01-29 19:07:39
Subject: Re: libpq notice processors

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group