Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: My SGML build fixed

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: My SGML build fixed
Date: 2003-12-18 00:15:12
Message-ID: 200312180015.hBI0FCA26136@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > My 5-minute SGML build is now working again.  The URL's are at
> > > > the bottom of the developers page.
> > >
> > > Why do we need two builds anyway?
> >
> > Good question --- historically, the SGML build on postgresql.org  was
> > often broken, sometimes for months, and the build isn't frequent
> > enough for someone to commit an SGML change, then quickly view a new
> > build to see if errors were introduced.
> 
> All of this has obviously not been true for a long time, so I repeat my 
> question.

How often does the postgresql.org site build the SGML files?  And just
last week the News build failed because it lost execution bits.  I still
don't trust dynamic content on postgresql.org to work reliably.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Jackson, HaroldDate: 2003-12-18 02:44:06
Subject: problem with getting return type mismatch from function
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-12-18 00:02:49
Subject: Re: My SGML build fixed

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group