From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Presentation: Adoption and Trends |
Date: | 2003-11-29 23:11:59 |
Message-ID: | 200311292311.hATNBx112493@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Neil Conway wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Here is a presentation I just finished for a talk in Japan. It
> > covers:
>
> > Comments welcome. I leave on Tuesday morning.
>
> Slide 6: How does open-source software bring "democracy" to software
> development? The core group may be benevolent, but a benevolent
> aristocracy is not a democracy by any means.
True, there are autocratic open software projects, but I was talking
more about PostgreSQL there, and the ability to take the source and make
a new distribution is democratic. I realize it is a stretch, but the
idea of centralized control has the same advantages/disadvantage in
government and software --- that was the point I was trying to make.
> Slide 14: The list of similar projects is a little baron -- I sent a
> list of ~10 to -advocacy a little while ago which I can resend if
> necessary/useful.
Yep. Please help me beef it up, but I am looking for ones visible
outside the open source world.
> Slide 15: Josh Berkus, despite being an all-round nice guy, is not a
> "PostgreSQL core developer" AFAIK :-)
Sure, he is, or has been for the past few months. The developers page
has not been updated, however.
> You might want to include NetBSD among the "distributed leadership"
> projects on slide 15. Also, are you sure that calling XFree86 governed
> by a "corporate council" is fair?
Not sure. I can remove it. I thought of NetBSD too but it didn't seem
visible enough outside the open source world. However, I just added it.
This presentation is an intro to open source so therefore I was hoping
for something that was visible outside open source, like Linux and
Mozilla.
> In slide 18, you might want to mention that a drawback of OSS is that
> sometimes features that developers don't find interesting (such as a
> native Win32 port or a better upgrade story) aren't implemented as
> quickly as they might be in a commercial environment.
Any ideas how to phrase that?
> There is a typo on slide 31: s/Practial/Practical/
Fixed.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-11-29 23:42:01 | Re: Presentation: Adoption and Trends |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2003-11-29 22:44:59 | Re: Presentation: Adoption and Trends |