From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql-server/src backend/bootstrap/Tag: backen ... |
Date: | 2003-09-08 02:30:54 |
Message-ID: | 20030907233012.M4862@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> I thought the consensus of the discussion was that this was not
> >>> necessary. It sure doesn't strike me as a good idea.
>
> > Also, keep in mind that in the end most folks will be building under
> > MinGW using a release tarball, that has those output files. We haven't
> > gotten a MinGW release yet, so they have to build all the stuff.
>
> Well, that's a fair argument, but why don't you get Marc to set up
> nightly snapshots for the WIN32_DEV branch? That only costs cycles
> in the short term. Polluting CVS with updates to derived files will
> cost us CVS storage forever.
Easy enough, and done ...
ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/win32_dev
will have it run nighty like the regular snapshot
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-08 02:54:49 | Re: pgsql-server/src backend/bootstrap/Tag: backen ... |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-08 02:20:21 | Re: pgsql-server/src backend/bootstrap/Tag: backen ... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-08 02:54:49 | Re: pgsql-server/src backend/bootstrap/Tag: backen ... |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-08 02:20:21 | Re: pgsql-server/src backend/bootstrap/Tag: backen ... |