On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Thomas Swan wrote:
> Has anyone looked at changing the default block size across the board
> and what the performance improvements/penalties might be? Hardware has
> changed quite a bit over the years.
I *think* that the reason for the performance improvement on FreeBSD is
that our FS block size is 16k, instead of 8k ... are there any other
OSs that have increased theirs?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jim Mercer||Date: 2003-08-28 22:32:59|
|Subject: Re: Bumping block size to 16K on FreeBSD...|
|Previous:||From: Ron Johnson||Date: 2003-08-28 22:04:19|
|Subject: Re: Replication Ideas|