Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, "Chad N(dot) Tindel" <chad(at)tindel(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls
Date: 2003-08-04 16:49:01
Message-ID: 200308040949.01128.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Chad, Scott:

> > Yes. The documentation very clearly states using sequences instead of
> > auto-increment, but it doesn't make it clear that inserting the id's into
> > data by hand doesn't cause the sequence to be auto-matically incremented.
> > It'd be nice of postgres had a way to trigger an update of the sequence
> > value after every insert containing an id clumn.

Um, how would this be a bennefit? If you're inserting rows 101-259, how does
it benefit you to have the system automatically increment the sequence from
601-759?

FWIW, in 7.5 we're likely to implement SQL3 IDENTITY columns ... basically
just a SERIAL column where you don't have the option of inserting your own
value, you have to take what it gives you.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chad N. Tindel 2003-08-04 17:23:02 Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2003-08-04 16:37:16 Re: Mysql -> Postgresql pitfalls