Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Replication Status

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tim Perdue <tim(at)perdue(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replication Status
Date: 2003-04-01 00:23:38
Message-ID: 20030331202148.H5872@hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
http://www.erserver.com is the newest, much improved, incarnation ... much
simpler installation and adminstration, and does multi-slave ...

On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Tim Perdue wrote:

> I was using rserv about two years ago, but it wasn't terribly efficient.
> Has rserv or any other replication solution improved much?
>
> I would appreciate any opinions and links, as I'm not pulling up much
> recent info in the list search.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tim
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>


In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-04-01 01:24:30
Subject: Re: System lockup
Previous:From: scott.marloweDate: 2003-04-01 00:18:58
Subject: Re: System lockup

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group