Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped?

From: Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)pingpong(dot)net>,<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped?
Date: 2002-12-30 11:35:22
Message-ID: 20021230063425.W47916-100000@m20.unixathome.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

> ps. Why is Postgres 7.3 still in ports/databases/postgresql-devel ??

I forgot one other possible answer: perhaps the port maintainer is taking
a well deserved holiday?


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Palle GirgensohnDate: 2002-12-30 12:01:06
Subject: Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped?
Previous:From: Dan LangilleDate: 2002-12-30 11:28:46
Subject: Re: why was libpq.so's version number bumped?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group