Re: [SQL] LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE or FOR UPDATE LIMIT 1?

From: Magnus Enbom <dot(at)rockstorm(dot)se>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [SQL] LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE or FOR UPDATE LIMIT 1?
Date: 2002-08-28 08:28:41
Message-ID: 20020828102841.A23539@ford.rockstorm.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql

On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:45:24PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> OK, patch attached. It was actually easier than I thought. We have to
> decide if we are going to remove the old syntax in 7.4.
>
> Regression tests pass. No doc updates yet.

Thanks alot! I don't mind keeping the old syntax.

-- M

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2002-08-28 08:41:27 Re: [HACKERS] pg_attribute.attisinherited ?
Previous Message D'Arcy J.M. Cain 2002-08-28 08:05:21 Re: MemoryContextAlloc: invalid request size 1934906735

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ivan Jordanov 2002-08-28 11:27:09 Can I use "UPDATE" sql statement in trigger before or after update ?
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-08-28 08:15:22 Re: signed/unsigned integers