Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [SQL] LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE or FOR UPDATE LIMIT 1?

From: Magnus Enbom <dot(at)rockstorm(dot)se>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [SQL] LIMIT 1 FOR UPDATE or FOR UPDATE LIMIT 1?
Date: 2002-08-28 08:28:41
Message-ID: 20020828102841.A23539@ford.rockstorm.se (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-sql
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:45:24PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> OK, patch attached.  It was actually easier than I thought.  We have to
> decide if we are going to remove the old syntax in 7.4.
> 
> Regression tests pass.  No doc updates yet.

Thanks alot! I don't mind keeping the old syntax. 

-- M

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2002-08-28 08:41:27
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_attribute.attisinherited ?
Previous:From: D'Arcy J.M. CainDate: 2002-08-28 08:05:21
Subject: Re: MemoryContextAlloc: invalid request size 1934906735

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: Ivan JordanovDate: 2002-08-28 11:27:09
Subject: Can I use "UPDATE" sql statement in trigger before or after update ?
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2002-08-28 08:15:22
Subject: Re: signed/unsigned integers

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group