Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: timeout implementation issues

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jessica Perry Hekman <jphekman(at)dynamicdiagrams(dot)com>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: timeout implementation issues
Date: 2002-03-30 05:16:36
Message-ID: 200203300516.g2U5GaN02291@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jessica Perry Hekman <jphekman(at)dynamicdiagrams(dot)com> writes:
> > [snip]
> > My proposal, then, is that the Java driver should submit the
> > transaction request; wait for the timeout; if it goes off, submit a
> > cancel request; and then throw a SQLException. We would not handle
> > this in the backend at all.
> 
> > Bruce agreed that this was a good point to ask what the rest of the
> > hackers list thought. Any input?
> 
> I guess the $64 question is whether any frontends other than JDBC want
> this behavior.  If it's JDBC-only then I'd certainly vote for making
> JDBC handle it ... but as soon as we see several different frontends
> implementing similar behavior, I'd say it makes sense to implement it
> once in the backend.
> 
> So, what's the market?

There is clearly interest from all interfaces.  This item has been
requested quite often, usually related to client apps or web apps.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Justin CliftDate: 2002-03-30 05:29:15
Subject: Posix AIO in new Red Hat Linux
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2002-03-30 04:36:39
Subject: Re: timeout implementation issues

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group