From: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
Cc: | pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, jwbaker(at)acm(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem |
Date: | 2001-12-30 07:53:09 |
Message-ID: | 20011230165309K.t-ishii@sra.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc |
> > If you code up a patch, I will test it on my SMP machine using pgbench.
> > Hopefully this will help Tatsuo's 4-way AIX machine too, and Linux.
>
> Attached is a proposed patch (against the current-CVS version of
> lwlock.c). I haven't committed this yet, but it seems to be a win on
> a single CPU. Can people try it on multi CPUs?
Your patches seem lightly enhanced 7.2 performance on AIX 5L (still
slower than 7.1, however).
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
image/png | 6.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-12-30 16:52:58 | Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-12-30 04:32:11 | Constent coding style |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-12-30 16:52:58 | Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-12-30 02:42:00 | Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem |