> > > I would propose that the reference machine be one that one of the
> > > "committers" owns, and be one whose owner is willing to *always* go
> > > through the effort to resolve regression test changes and differences.
> > Er ... wasn't that *you*?
> 
> Yes. At the moment my toes are bright red and sore from being stepped
> on, and I'm trying to get out of the way or figure out what the problems
> are. I'm happy to continue to contribute things like this, but don't
> like being held up then bypassed then ignored (cf current docs building
> troubles). I'm frustrated.

I think we are all just scrambing to get beta ready while the server
reconfigures itself.  :-)  I don't see any fundamental changes being
proposed.  We are trying to plug leaks and are stepping on toes, or at
least it looks that way sometimes.  :-)  I can yank my CVS build if it
causes confusion once we get the main one working.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

• Re: cvs tip problems at 2001-10-01 21:01:10 from Thomas Lockhart

Responses

• Re: cvs tip problems at 2001-10-01 21:19:24 from Lamar Owen
• Re: cvs tip problems at 2001-10-02 12:22:40 from Marc G. Fournier

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Brent R. Matzelle	Date: 2001-10-01 21:10:16
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] PostgreSQL / PHP Overrun Error
Previous:	From: Thomas Lockhart	Date: 2001-10-01 21:05:22
	Subject: Re: cvs problem