Re: Pre-forking backend

From: sean-pgsql-hackers(at)chittenden(dot)org
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pre-forking backend
Date: 2001-09-30 02:28:01
Message-ID: 20010929192801.C46126@rand.tgd.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > How hard would it be to pre-fork an extra backend
>
> How are you going to pass the connection socket to an already-forked
> child process? AFAIK there's no remotely portable way ...

Umm... Apache? They use a preforking model and it works quite well for
every *NIX that Apache runs on. ;) Maybe RSE can comment on this
further... -sc

--
Sean Chittenden

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2001-09-30 02:31:20 Re: Spinlock performance improvement proposal
Previous Message Lincoln Yeoh 2001-09-30 01:54:44 Re: Pre-forking backend