Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Log rotation?

From: darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain)
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane)
Cc: peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net (Peter Eisentraut), pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org (PostgreSQL Development)
Subject: Re: Log rotation?
Date: 2001-09-06 12:33:22
Message-ID: 20010906123322.8DA541A6B@druid.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Thus spake Tom Lane
> Also, I kinda thought the long-range solution was to encourage everyone
> to migrate to syslog logging ...
> 
> > And no, "use syslog" doesn't count.
> 
> Why not?

Well, one "why not" might be that syslog is not a guaranteed delivery
logging system.  It might be good enough for some applications but I
don't think that it should be forced on everyone.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net>   |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Doug McNaughtDate: 2001-09-06 12:39:27
Subject: Re: Is there a problem running vacuum in the middle of a transaction?
Previous:From: D'Arcy J.M. CainDate: 2001-09-06 12:18:48
Subject: Re: CVS access

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group