Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bytea binary compatible

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bytea binary compatible
Date: 2001-06-24 21:00:04
Message-ID: 200106242100.f5OL04s28715@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > OK, code backed out.  If the storage formats are the same, doesn't that
> > make them binary compatibile.

Actually, I didn't mean to even apply the bytea patch I backed out.  It
accidentally got when I applied RESET ALL and I only realized it later.
I had the diff in a separate file so it was easy to back out.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-06-25 01:53:51
Subject: Re: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-06-24 03:12:41
Subject: Re: Bytea binary compatible

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group