> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Now that I look at it, this patch is pretty broken. For one, calling
> > SetConfigOption("option_name", optarg, PGC_POSTMASTER, true);
> > when the option letter doesn't take an argument is surely wrong.
> > Hint: Try 'postmaster -i'.
> Also try
> postmaster -o -F
> which has always worked in the past. Now it causes backends to fail
> to start up, saying
> FATAL 1: 'fsync' cannot be changed now
OK, I have backed out the patch and attached it here. Marko, can you
fix the problems and resubmit? Thanks.
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2001-06-19 23:46:02|
|Subject: Re: possible patch to increase number of hash overflow pages?|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2001-06-19 21:58:48|
|Subject: Re: use GUC for cmdline |