Re: On the _need_ to vacuum...

From: geustace(at)godzone(dot)net(dot)nz
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: On the _need_ to vacuum...
Date: 2001-04-29 16:53:42
Message-ID: 20010429043342.B59791B4DE@agree-6.godzone.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I am rather staggered by a developer considering it necessary to
attempt to cooerce the core development team into including a patch.

If the work that Alfred has done is as effective as he claims, then
there must be a *REALLY* good reason why it isn't being included.

I don't want to start any form of war....
But as a user I'd be interested to know why such a patch would appear
to be unacceptable.

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Glen Eustace,
GodZone Internet Services, a division of AGRE Enterprises Ltd.,
P.O. Box 8020, Palmerston North, New Zealand 5301
Ph/Fax: +64 6 357 8168, Mob: +64 21 424 015

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eliel Mamousette 2001-04-29 17:08:02 SQL Server -> Postgres migration: Stored Procedure replacement?
Previous Message Paul M Foster 2001-04-29 16:31:13 Re: Re: On the _need_ to vacuum...