Re: Re: 7.1 vacuum

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
Cc: mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, "Magnus Naeslund(f)" <mag(at)fbab(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: 7.1 vacuum
Date: 2001-04-27 15:28:18
Message-ID: 200104271528.f3RFSIg28501@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > What's the deal with vacuum lazy in 7.1? I was looking forward to it. It was
> > never clear whether or not you guys decided to put it in.
> >
> > If it is in as a feature, how does one use it?
> > If it is a patch, how does one get it?
>
> If you actually download and read the enclosed READMEs it's pretty
> clear.
>
> > If it is neither a patch nor an existing feature, has development stopped?
>
> I have no idea, I haven't been tracking postgresql all that much
> since leaving the place where we contracted that work.

Vadim never got to merging into the 7.1 tree.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dominic J. Eidson 2001-04-27 15:39:10 Patch to include PAM support...
Previous Message Alfred Perlstein 2001-04-27 12:55:17 Re: 7.1 vacuum