From: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go. |
Date: | 2001-03-22 16:56:42 |
Message-ID: | 20010322.16564200@ler-freebie.iadfw.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc |
In a very quick look I just made, I tend to agree with Tom, that the
whole non-gcc, non-windows stuff should go.
LER
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 3/22/01, 10:20:11 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote regarding Re:
[HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go. :
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Larry Rosenman writes:
> >> Why do WE define _fini?
> > Because we need to 'fini' something, I suspect.
> See src/interfaces/odbc/psqlodbc.c line 126. It doesn't look to me like
> the _fini() does anything useful; could we take it out?
> We do not actually need the _init() anymore either. Possibly the whole
> #ifdef not-Windows segment (lines 92-132) is just asking for trouble and
> should be removed.
> regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-22 16:58:44 | Re: Potential RC1-stoppers |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-03-22 16:51:32 | Re: Re: pg_upgrade |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-22 17:05:29 | Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go. |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-03-22 16:43:00 | Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go. |