Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.
Date: 2001-03-22 16:56:42
Message-ID: 20010322.16564200@ler-freebie.iadfw.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc

In a very quick look I just made, I tend to agree with Tom, that the
whole non-gcc, non-windows stuff should go.

LER

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 3/22/01, 10:20:11 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote regarding Re:
[HACKERS] odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go. :

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > Larry Rosenman writes:
> >> Why do WE define _fini?

> > Because we need to 'fini' something, I suspect.

> See src/interfaces/odbc/psqlodbc.c line 126. It doesn't look to me like
> the _fini() does anything useful; could we take it out?

> We do not actually need the _init() anymore either. Possibly the whole
> #ifdef not-Windows segment (lines 92-132) is just asking for trouble and
> should be removed.

> regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-03-22 16:58:44 Re: Potential RC1-stoppers
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-03-22 16:51:32 Re: Re: pg_upgrade

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-03-22 17:05:29 Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-03-22 16:43:00 Re: odbc/UnixWare 7.1.1: No Go.