Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: Fixes to index pages

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Fixes to index pages
Date: 2001-02-22 03:22:42
Message-ID: 200102220322.WAA10784@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > > > > > > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > >
> > > I don't think it's a good idea to fill bit 13 by force.
> > > There's only 1 bit unused. IMHO there must be a discussion
> > > about how to use the bit.
> > 
> > I am not doing anything to 7.1, just 7.2.  My patch is just an attempt
> > to make the source accurate. 
> 
> Hmm I've already been confused by your attempt.
> For example, oops where's the discussion about changing
> index tuple length limit ? etc ...
> And I understand now that the original question was thrown
> to Tom. I'll leave the choise to Tom.

The patch never intended to increase the index tuple length.  It was
only to better document how IndexTupleData is used.  Both Tom and I
agreed that the use of bits/contants/macros in itup.h was not idea, and
needed a little cleaning.  That's all the patch does.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-02-22 03:49:18
Subject: Re: Fixes to index pages
Previous:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2001-02-22 02:46:18
Subject: Re: Re: Fixes to index pages

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group