Re: Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling.

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, PGSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling.
Date: 2000-10-28 19:41:24
Message-ID: 200010281941.PAA17589@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> > Err, with Tom's objections, why was this applied?
>
> > * Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> [001028 11:34]:
> >> Applied. Thanks.
>
> Itchy trigger finger today, Bruce?
>
> Please revert the change --- I'm still discussing it with Kevin offlist,
> but I don't feel it's acceptable as-is because it breaks reasonable
> (non-redundant) UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT constructs that have worked for
> several releases past.

Backed out. I applied it because you said "it was not unacceptible", so
I thought you liked it.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-10-28 20:41:41 Re: syntax
Previous Message Kevin O'Gorman 2000-10-28 19:12:00 Re: Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling.