Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] when does CREATE VIEW not create a view?

From: t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp
To: reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] when does CREATE VIEW not create a view?
Date: 2000-08-29 01:12:38
Message-ID: 20000829101238Y.t-ishii@sra.co.jp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
> > Oh, the patch strikes me since it is not "multibyte aware."  Are you
> > going to put it into the CVS? If so, please let me know after you do
> > it so that I could add the multibyte awareness to that.
> 
> Well, I meant it to go into CVS, if noone objected. I consider your raising
> the multibyte issue sufficent objection to have it held off. No point
> patching and repatching.

No problem for repatching I think, since we are in the development
cycle anyway.

> The problem is that I just chop it off at NAMEDATALEN, which might be
> in the middle of a multibyte character, correct?

Exactly.

> Ah, I see code in parser/scan.l that does the multibyte aware version
> of the chop. Should I just rewrite my patch with that code as a model?

Please do so. If you need any help, please let me know.
--
Tatsuo Ishii


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew SelleDate: 2000-08-29 03:09:45
Subject: Re: Re: UNION JOIN vs UNION SELECT
Previous:From: ChrisDate: 2000-08-29 01:07:25
Subject: Re: Re: UNION JOIN vs UNION SELECT

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-08-29 04:15:40
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] RE: Access PostgreSQL server via SSL/Internet
Previous:From: Alex KapranoffDate: 2000-08-28 18:19:23
Subject: Re: Unbreak plperl building

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group