From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE |
Date: | 2000-06-09 16:11:26 |
Message-ID: | 200006091611.MAA02166@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
>
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Applied. I had a little trouble getting the patch to apply cleanly.
> > Seems some code has moved, and the patch actually put it in the wrong
> > place in two cases. The context wasn't large enough. I think I got
> > them all in the right place.
>
> Hmm, a question is if this patch will have long lifetime. Possible is that
> new ACL (etc.) implement some features from this patch.
>
> But, I mean that CREATE TABLE restriction is needful in large multiuser
> projects.
>
> BWT. --- if Peter implement new ACL, I plan 'CREATE PROFILE' feature for
> better user control (connection idle time, default ACL mask
> ...etc.).
Well, we clearly need ability to prevent table creation, and lock
control is good too. Seems useful.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-09 16:12:52 | Re: psql prompt |
Previous Message | Karel Zak | 2000-06-09 16:04:51 | Re: NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE |