From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER |
Date: | 2000-05-26 01:31:55 |
Message-ID: | 200005260131.VAA19027@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > If you don't get rid of those then your parser will behave in surprising
> > ways. So far you have noticed the fallout from only one of those
> > conflicts, but every one of them is a potential bug. Be advised that
> > gram.y patches that create unresolved conflicts will *not* be accepted.
>
> I thought shift/reduce conflicts were part and parcel of most language
> syntaxes. reduce/reduce being rather more naughty. The standard syntax
> already produces 95 shift/reduce conflicts. Can you clarify about
> unresolved conflicts not being accepted?
What? I get zero here. shift/reduce is sloppy programming. We don't
do that here. :-)
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2000-05-26 01:34:32 | Re: \dS and \df <pattern> crashing psql |
Previous Message | Kevin Lo | 2000-05-26 01:21:40 | [DONE] PostgreSQL-7.0 binary for WinNT |