Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY
Date: 2000-04-06 17:54:11
Message-ID: 200004061754.NAA28894@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> At 11:38 AM 4/6/00 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> > I am doing the chapter on temporary tables.  Should I show examples
> >> > using TEMP or TEMPORARY?
> >> 
> >> TEMPORARY is SQL92 standard, TEMP is not.  Nuff said...
> >
> >OK, but TEMPORARY doesn't work on 6.5.*, right?
> 
> Won't 7.0 be the release version by the time the book is actually
> published? :)

Yes.  I was just getting confirmation before putting in a 7.0-specific
thing.  However, TEMPORARY is supported in 6.5.*, so I am in good shape
with TEMPORARY.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-04-06 17:55:16
Subject: Re: Vacuuming temporary tables
Previous:From: Don BaccusDate: 2000-04-06 17:45:40
Subject: RE: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group