Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

From: "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Russell Smith" <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Date: 2008-01-28 06:55:16
Message-ID: 1d4e0c10801272255s69fb7e78qbbb49ae4c80a9be@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Hi Russell,

On Jan 28, 2008 7:27 AM, Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
> Can somebody explain why it's important to load with
> synchronized_scanning off?
>
> do_sql_command(g_conn, "SET synchronized_scanning TO off");

It's the start point of this patch. See this thread [
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-01/msg00987.php ]
for more information.

--
Guillaume

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Premsun CholtanwanichDate: 2008-01-28 07:18:30
Subject: Slow Query problem
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2008-01-28 06:54:24
Subject: Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Russell SmithDate: 2008-01-28 08:59:18
Subject: Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2008-01-28 06:54:24
Subject: Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group