From: | Peter Mount <petermount(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "'ojeannet(at)slb(dot)com'" <ojeannet(at)slb(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | RE: bytea not recognized by JDBC (7.0.2) |
Date: | 2000-11-29 09:16:26 |
Message-ID: | 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478CF1B5E1@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support Officer, Maidstone Borough Council
Email: petermount(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk
WWW: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk
All views expressed within this email are not the views of Maidstone Borough
Council
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olivier Jeannet [mailto:jeannet(at)montrouge(dot)tt(dot)slb(dot)com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 4:42 PM
> To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [INTERFACES] bytea not recognized by JDBC (7.0.2)
[snip]
> How can I select a "bytea" field ?
getBytes() should work.
> Is this a bug of the JDBC driver (or a not implemented feature) ?
No not quite. getObject() currently doesn't know about bytea, so it's
passing it on to the Serializable code which is then failing.
> I have looked at the mailing-list but didn't find the answer to my
> problem.
Actually I cant remember anyone asking about bytea, which is why it's got
overlooked.
Peter
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Mount | 2000-11-29 09:35:08 | RE: postgreSQL and javascript |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2000-11-29 08:37:29 | RE: slow odbc access.... |