Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ed Loehr <ELOEHR(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL
Date: 1999-12-26 00:13:26
Message-ID: 199912260013.TAA29685@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
> > > system that won't stay up consistently is approaching worthlessness
> > > for mission-critical 24x7 applications.   And if the masses
> > > leave because of system reliability problems, you can be very,
> > > very certain about what they will tell their friends and coworkers.
> >
> > And we don't have a problem in this area, do we?
> 
> Please tell me you're kidding.

We don't have roll-forward logging until 7.1, and require vacuum
regularly.  Other than that, I don't know of any major issues. 
Reliability has always been of primary importance.  We wouldn't be where
we are today without reliability.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Clark C. EvansDate: 1999-12-26 01:43:44
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Ed LoehrDate: 1999-12-25 23:23:26
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group