Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: "Sergio A(dot) Kessler" <ser(at)perio(dot)unlp(dot)edu(dot)ar>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)
Date: 1999-10-11 15:43:33
Message-ID: 199910111543.LAA29508@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

> > Yes, we have discussed this, and will add it to the TODO list.
> > > can the commands createuser and destroyuser be renamed to
> > > pg_createuser and pg_destroyuser (as pg_dump) adding soft links to
> > > preserve backwards compatibility (declaring previous commands
> > > deprecated) ?
> > > the same can be done for createdb and destroydb ...
>
> I hope we don't have a consensus on this. Long commands with
> underscores in them are certainly another sign of the coming
> apocalypse ;)

But if we keep symlinks to the existing names, is that OK?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brook Milligan 1999-10-11 16:56:30 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 1999-10-11 15:30:54 RE: Scan by TID (was RE: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator)

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brook Milligan 1999-10-11 16:56:30 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-10-11 15:17:46 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)