Re: [GENERAL] postgreSQL for storing a database of documents

Your e-mail did not arrive at its intended destination. You need to
send it to Michael J. Davis, not Michael Davis

From: dustin sallings <dustin @ spy.net> on 05/05/99 01:57 AM
To: mtony @ iname(dot)com(at)SMTP@EXCHANGE
cc: pgsql-general @ postgreSQL(dot)org(at)SMTP@EXCHANGE
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] postgreSQL for storing a database of
documents

On Tue, 4 May 1999, Mark Fleming wrote:

// That a good solution, but now that XML is starting to break off
it
// kinda puts PostgreSQL users at a disadvantage. We have to have
// static XML documents on on disk in order to use the format and
have
// external search engines to search for content in the documents.
It
// is not that big of a headache, but is an inconvenience. I will
be
// doing some work on XML soon for my job and they are going
straight
// Oracle because they want to create "searchable" XML documents on
the
// fly to post and distribute on the web. Very LARGE documents.
Like
// the legal code for NYC and such. When Postgre starts using large
// objects it is going to make a lot of noise. Especially for
// "start-up" companies.

What do you mean when Postgres starts using large objects?
It has
for quite some time now. I chose not to use it because I don't like
the
way the data is stored on disk, though.

--
Principal Member Technical Staff, beyond.com The world is
watching America,
pub 1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net>
| Key fingerprint = 87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6 C8 0F 3E 65 51 98
D8 BE
L______________________________________________ and America is
watching TV. __