Re: [HACKERS] RE: Mysql comparison

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu (Thomas Lockhart)
Cc: joel(at)trafficx(dot)com, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RE: Mysql comparison
Date: 1999-04-27 16:25:20
Message-ID: 199904271625.MAA03315@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > You totally missed on this one. It was on the POSTGRESQL SITE that said
> > that postgresql is not multithreaded! On the comparison chart comparing
> > postgresql with other databases, oracle and sybase are the only ones
> > listed as multithreaded.
>
> Is my face red :(
>
> I'll save the MySQL diatribe for later...

My experience is that MySQL has gotten better at being more honest.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-04-27 16:35:39 Re: [HACKERS] Hacker found bug in Postgres ?
Previous Message Jan Wieck 1999-04-27 16:24:23 Re: [HACKERS] views and group by (formerly: create view as selec