Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug (?)t

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu (Thomas G(dot) Lockhart)
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug (?)t
Date: 1998-12-06 16:12:07
Message-ID: 199812061612.LAA13053@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Speaking of which, are you or Bruce (or anyone else) thinking of testing
> the unsigned int vs size_t for the Size typedef recently mentioned by
> Oliver? Can we count on all platforms to have size_t defined? If so, we
> could consider adding it in for v6.4.1. I'm currently working on getting
> min() and max() to work with string types, but could drop that to polish
> things for a v6.4.1 release.

I think everyone has size_t. It is s POSIX requirement. Sounds like a
good change.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eric Lee Green 1998-12-06 20:45:15 Re: [INTERFACES] crypt not included when compiling libpgtcl !!!!!!!
Previous Message Tom Lane 1998-12-06 07:58:46 Re: [HACKERS] Parser bug (?)