> Hi all
> 
> Is it too late to add a feature to pg_dump for 6.4??
> 
> I just spent most of the day learning pg_dump and modifing it so it would
> dump views also.
> 
> This is the first time I have ever contributed any code changes, so I'm
> not sure of how to submit it.
> 
> The diff's and a readme as a tgz file are attached.
> 
> Thanks
> Terry Mackintosh <terry(at)terrym(dot)com>          http://www.terrym.com
> sysadmin/owner  Please! No MIME encoded or HTML mail, unless needed.

I though we dumped views already.  If not, I am inclinded to apply it,
but want to see what others say.  I thought Jan was working on this, or
was that just rewrite rules?  Are you using his code?  I know there is
an item on the Open Items list that talks about this:

	have psql dump out rules text with new function

Is that what this is?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

• Dumping of views -- done! at 1998-10-03 20:25:30 from Terry Mackintosh

Responses

• Re: [HACKERS] Dumping of views -- done! at 1998-10-04 02:49:14 from Terry Mackintosh
• Re: [HACKERS] Dumping of views -- done! at 1998-10-05 04:56:08 from Marc G. Fournier

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 1998-10-04 01:57:30
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF)
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 1998-10-04 01:02:21
	Subject: IP test program