Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PG95-DEV] Rule system

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com
Cc: wieck(at)sapserv(dot)debis(dot)de, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PG95-DEV] Rule system
Date: 1998-07-09 15:05:56
Message-ID: 199807091505.LAA20916@candle.pha.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>     I  hoped to get pl/pgsql finished before 6.4, but since I got
>     some private trouble and much serious work, I  fear  to  miss
>     that target too.  Haven't had my fingers on PostgreSQL at all
>     for the last weeks.
> 
>     But you're right, the rewrite handler still  needs  work  and
>     since  I  spent  much time to understand the code it would be
>     wasted time if someone else has to do it.
> 
>     Let's see if I find some time sometimes :-)

That would be good.  The pl/pgsql would be nice, but the rewrite system
is more significant to users right now.

-- 
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 1998-07-09 15:16:01
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New s_lock.h fails on HPUX with gcc
Previous:From: Maarten BoekholdDate: 1998-07-09 14:31:24
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group