Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem and operator question

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de>
To: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu (Thomas G(dot) Lockhart)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org (PostgreSQL Hacker)
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] initdb problem and operator question
Date: 1998-04-28 12:44:33
Message-ID: 199804281244.OAA04962@gauss.topsystem.de (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Thomas G. Lockhart writes:
> Not currently used. afaik this syntax wasn't allowed in the Ingres
> embedded SQL. Do other ones allow it? Perhaps you could implement it in

Not that I know of. But I like the possibility to allow it. And why
shouldn't we be better than the commercial ones? :-)

> your scanner as a special case? That way, extra spaces could be used to
> allow "->" to continue to be a potential Postgres operator...

You mean: :a->b means the variable and :a -> b means the operator? Sounds
good to me.

I'll check that

Michael

-- 
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager    | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de                    | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
meskes(at)debian(dot)org                      | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire!             | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
Use Debian GNU/Linux!                  | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Oliver ElphickDate: 1998-04-28 14:47:20
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: User names cannot contain `-'
Previous:From: Thomas G. LockhartDate: 1998-04-28 12:38:29
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Bug#21681: postgresql: Doesn't allow granting to www-data

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group