>This is going to be slightly painful to do, since it has to be done
>manually, but I've put up a patch against v6.3 based on reports that have
>come in since it was released 2 weeks ago.
>
>The patch is purely a *test*...do not use it production yet, I just want
>to know whether it works fine or not, and whether there are any problems
>with it.
>
>The patch is a tar file, which contains a 'cvs diff -rrelease-6-3', as
>well as those files that are new since that tag was written...
>
>The file can be found in
>
>	ftp.postgresql.org:/pub/patches/.test/v6.3p1.tar.gz
>
>and is hidden from public view... 

It seems that some files in my "multi-byte patch" are missing. Without
them the patch is meaningless and I cannot test v6.3p1.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp

Responses

• Re: [HACKERS] First mega-patch... at 1998-03-19 04:10:01 from The Hermit Hacker

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: PostgreSQL On Peanuts.roanoke.edu	Date: 1998-03-18 04:09:07
	Subject: default time/data 'now' broken in 6.3? linux-elf 2.0.33, i686
Previous:	From: Ryan Kirkpatrick	Date: 1998-03-18 02:02:36
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Alpha initdb fixed!