Re: [HACKERS] lock table syntax

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at (Zeugswetter Andreas DBT)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] lock table syntax
Date: 1998-03-16 04:40:06
Message-ID: 199803160440.XAA21933@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> Hullo,
>
> I seen the new lock table help in psql:
> I think we should stick to the (pseudo)standard syntax right from the
> beginning.
> Or maybe allow both, but i think at least the table keyword should be
> mandatory
> to simplify implementation of other locks (like database).
>
> lock table <tablename> in {exclusive|share} mode;
>
> What we have now would conform to exclusive mode (works inside a
> transaction only, ok but
> that's the most important case :-).

Added to TODO list.

--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-03-16 04:40:48 Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE Problem
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-03-16 03:45:37 Re: [QUESTIONS] MySQL benchmark page