Re: [HACKERS] Current 6.3 issues

From: Tom I Helbekkmo <tih(at)Hamartun(dot)Priv(dot)NO>
To: t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, t-ishii(at)srapc451(dot)sra(dot)co(dot)jp
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Current 6.3 issues
Date: 1998-02-23 20:47:34
Message-ID: 19980223214734.02308@Hamartun.Priv.NO
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 23, 1998 at 12:28:48PM +0900, t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp wrote:

> (2) 6.3 doesn't use -Dsunos4 anymore. However we have such codes as:
>
> #if defined(sunos4)
> #define memmove(d, s, l) bcopy(s, d, l)
> #include <unistd.h>
> #endif
>
> this leads to compiling errors in various places. Should we use
> #if defined(sparc) && !defined(__svr4)
> instead?

The above test does not necessarily mean that the system runs SunOS 4!
It would be true on the machine I'm sending this from as well, an SS2
running NetBSD/sparc...

-tih
--
Popularity is the hallmark of mediocrity. --Niles Crane, "Frasier"

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 1998-02-23 20:49:48 Re: pl/{perl,pgsql} (was Re: AW: [HACKERS] triggers, views and ru
Previous Message Henry Spencer 1998-02-23 20:42:27 Re: Appended a string of text to each line in a file