Re: enable_joinremoval

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: enable_joinremoval
Date: 2010-03-29 19:55:28
Message-ID: 19848.1269892528@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:31 -0600, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:17, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> You're not addressing the original point. I have been asked how would
>>> users know which tables have been removed and whether there is a way of
>>> checking that.
>>
>> Uhh... they wont be in the explain output... Seems simple enough.

> That is exactly what I replied, though nobody felt that was a great
> answer.

Who complained about that exactly? It seems like a perfectly
appropriate answer to me.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-03-29 19:57:41 Re: enable_joinremoval
Previous Message Alex Hunsaker 2010-03-29 19:54:57 Re: enable_joinremoval