Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Regarding PQputline and PQendcopy

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: soni de <soni(dot)de(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Regarding PQputline and PQendcopy
Date: 2006-11-29 15:38:44
Message-ID: 19605.1164814724@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> soni de wrote:
>> Any response?

> Yes. First posting this just 6 hours after your original is both 
> impatient and rude.

> Second, you should upgrade to a modern and supported version of 
> Postgres. Nobody is going to want to support you on a version as out of 
> date as 7.2.4.

And third, this was not a hacker-grade question.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-11-29 15:43:11
Subject: Re: small patch with czech translations for names of months and days
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2006-11-29 15:09:12
Subject: Re: custom variable classes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group