Re: My SGML build fixed

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: My SGML build fixed
Date: 2003-12-18 14:51:38
Message-ID: 19493.1071759098@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

"Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Right now it just seems like a waste of resources and it confuses the
> onlookers.

If Bruce is willing to expend the resources, what's the problem?
I kinda like having some redundancy in this service, myself.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-12-18 16:54:54 Re: My SGML build fixed
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-12-18 14:32:22 Re: My SGML build fixed