Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: My SGML build fixed

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: My SGML build fixed
Date: 2003-12-18 14:51:38
Message-ID: 19493.1071759098@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
"Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Right now it just seems like a waste of resources and it confuses the
> onlookers.

If Bruce is willing to expend the resources, what's the problem?
I kinda like having some redundancy in this service, myself.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-12-18 16:54:54
Subject: Re: My SGML build fixed
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-12-18 14:32:22
Subject: Re: My SGML build fixed

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group